Kudos to Prof. Niels Hoiby, an eminent Danish microbiologist, for being the first to identify the error. As the vaccination campaign took off in Denmark in early 2021, Hoiby watched the way the injections were being administered and was appalled to see that they were being given without prior aspiration. Even the vaccine administered to the Crown Prince of Denmark was administered without aspirating!

Now, a basic tenet of nursing studies (I have learnt) is that when giving an injection, a nurse must make sure to aspirate first – meaning to withdraw the needle in order to make sure that there is no blood – before administering the injection. The presence of blood would indicate that the injection has penetrated a vein. This is to be avoided on all counts, since it would allow the material being injected to enter directly into the bloodstream, causing dangerous side effects such as blood clots and sepsis. Today’s Covid vaccines are designed to be administered into a muscle thus preventing such a phenomenon. But unless the administrator takes the precaution of aspirating first, there is no guarantee that the vaccine will not enter the bloodstream.

Other indicators served as a red light for Prof. Hoiby. He noted an article in the Lancet describing the case of a patient who suffered severe inflammation of the liver, spleen and lungs following a dose of the Pfizer vaccine. “I sensed that this could only have happened if the vaccine had gone directly into the bloodstream,” he said.

Hoiby averted the Danish authorities and they quickly rectified the problem, instructing all vaccine administrators to aspirate first before giving the injection. Astonishingly, most Western countries, including the US and the UK, do not instruct Covid vaccine administrators to aspirate. “There is no need to aspirate,” declared former British vaccine minister Nadhim Zahawi.  In contrast, vaccine administrators in Taiwan, which has a low Covid mortality rate, methodically aspirate before administrating the injection. “We always aspirate,” said a Taiwanese nurse to an American patient who requested the measure, “because it is dangerous not to aspirate.”

Hoiby was baffled as to why Western countries have dropped this precautionary measure. After researching the matter, he found that the decision was based on just one scientific paper from Canada which showed that administration of a vaccine on 4-6 month old children caused less pain if aspiration was not conducted.

There is another possible explanation. One patient in the Netherlands was told by the nurse administrating the Covid vaccine that the reason why they do not aspirate first is economic: “if aspiration is conducted and blood is found, meaning the injection entered a vein instead of a muscle, then the vaccine dose must be thrown away and that would lead to unnecessary expenses.” There have also been numerous reports of patients experiencing a taste of metal in their mouths following a vaccine injection. This, says Hoiby, is an indication that the injection was given intravenously and, when this happens, systemic complications can occur within seconds.

One theory as to why so many top-rank athletes have been stricken with cardiac arrest or other heart problems soon after receiving a Covid vaccine (see Dec. 28 article on this subject) is that, since they have larger deltoid muscles and even larger veins than most people, this would put them at greater risk of receiving the injection in the vein.

Intrigued by the possible ramifications of administrating Covid vaccines without aspiration, Prof. Hoiby decided to compare the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis between Denmark and Norway. To its credit, when the Danish government was alerted by Hoiby, it quickly changed its policy and Covid vaccines have been administered with aspiration in Denmark since March 2021. In contrast, in Norway, the vaccines are administered without aspiration. Hoiby’s research showed that the rate of post-vaccine heart inflammation was three times higher in Norway than in Denmark. “The study showed a very clear statistical difference between the two countries,” says Hoiby.

In the interview, Dr. Malhotra referred to a research abstract published in an American Heart Disease journal by Dr. Steven Gundry which demonstrates a significant link between heart disease and the mRNA vaccines. The research, conducted on 566 patients, measured biomarkers before and after the patients received their second vaccine dose. The results showed that the risk of developing heart disease increased from 11% before vaccination to 25% after vaccination.  In Dr. Malhotra’s view, this represents a “huge increase” which calls for further investigation. Soon after the publication of the research, Dr. Malhotra recounts that he received a call from a whistleblower in the cardiology department of a very prestigious British institute who told him that his department had found similar results to Gundry’s but had decided not to go ahead and publish because of “concern about losing research money from the drug industry.” The whistleblower, a researcher himself, confessed that he was very troubled by this state of affairs.

In addition, Dr. Malhotra recounted that he has heard much anecdotal evidence from colleagues working in the field who reported that younger and younger people were coming in with heart attacks. He noted that since July 2021, there have been 10,000 excess deaths in the UK from non-Covid causes, a large percentage due to cardiac arrest and strokes.

On December 15, Argentine soccer player Sergio Aguero gave an emotional press conference in which he announced he would no longer be playing professional soccer.  Aged just 33, at the top of his career and considered one of the best strikers of his generation, Aguero told his fans and the world that he had to give up his beloved sport because of heart problems. On October 31, Aguero was struck with chest pains in the middle of a match and collapsed on the field. Rushed to hospital he was diagnosed with severe cardiac arrhythmia and, after weeks of testing, was advised not to play again.  “It is a very difficult moment,” he said, fighting back tears. Aguero was a proponent of the Covid vaccine and even went on TV to encourage teens to get vaccinated. His cardiologist has denied any link between Aguero’s heart condition and the vaccine, maintaining that Aguero suffered from heart palpitations at a young age.

In June, Danish soccer player, Christian Eriksen collapsed in front of 15 thousand fans in the middle of a Euro championship match against Finland. The 29 year old, who plays for Inter Milan and the Danish national team, suffered cardiac arrest. It took 20 minutes for a rescue team to revive him before they could transport him to hospital. It is unclear when and if he will be able to play again.

Aguero and Eriksen are just two high-profilers among many sportsmen who have been stricken with heart problems in the last year. An exhaustive report on the Israeli website “Zeman Emet” claims that 183 athletes (professional players, college players and coaches – the majority male) suffered heart problems this year (cardiac arrest, myocarditis and pericarditis). Of these, 108 died. Other outlets place the number of athletes who suffered heart problems closer to 300 and over. All the outlets provide detailed lists of the victims, with names and descriptions of the incidents.

Here are just a few of the athletes involved in such episodes :

Brandon Goodwin, 26 year old NBA player for the Atlanta Hawks suffered blood clots a short while after receiving the vaccine. The clots caused him extreme fatigue and back pains that made him unable to run and forced him to end the season early. “I was fine up until I took the vaccine,” he said.

David Wakefield, 27 year old cricketer who collapsed during training and suffered major cardiac arrest when his heart stopped for 26 minutes. It took six shocks with a defibrillator to get his heart beating again. He was diagnosed with myocarditis, treated in intensive care for three weeks and had to undergo extensive rehabilitation before he could walk again.

Fabrice Nsakala, 31 year old Congolese soccer player for the Turkish club Besiktas, collapsed on the pitch and was rushed to hospital.

Florian Dagoury, world record holder in static breath-hold freediving was diagnosed in December with myopericarditis 40 days after receiving his second Pfizer shot. He shared his experience on Instagram: “10 days after my second dose, I noticed that my heart rate was way higher than normal and my breath hold capacities went down significantly. I went to see a cardiologist and he told me it’s a common side effect of the Pfizer vaccine and it would pass. 40 days after, I had made no progress so I went to see another cardiologist and got diagnosed with myocarditis, pericarditis and Trivial Mitral regurgitation! There’s been a 30% decrease in my diving performance. My first thought and recommendation to freedivers around the world is to choose a vaccine which is done the old fashioned way like Sputnik, Sinovac, Sinopharm etc instead of those new mRNA vaccines.”

Michael Ojo, 27 year old basketball player, formerly with Florida State, collapsed during training in Serbia where he had played for Red Star Belgrade. He was rushed to hospital but died while undergoing resuscitation. .

Roy Butler, 23 year old Irish soccer player suffered a massive brain bleed and died 4 days after receiving the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. His family reported that, within one hour of receiving the jab, he began to have severe headaches and the next day suffered from vomiting and convulsions.

Alexaida Guedez, 30 year old marathon runner from Valencia collapsed during a race and died 50 meters from the finish line.

Yusuke Kinoshita, 27 year old Japanese baseball player collapsed during training 8 days after getting the vaccine, He died a month later in hospital.

Xander Verhagen, Joppe Erpels and Yarno van Herck, three young Belgian cyclists aged 15-17 belonging to the same club, were hospitalized within three weeks of each other and diagnosed with myocarditis.

Jeremy Chardy, 34 year old French tennis player suffered such a bad reaction after  receiving the Pfizer vaccine that he was forced to put an end to his 2021 season.  He said: “I don’t know when I will play again…I regret getting the vaccine.”

Alexandre Kisonga, 37 year old Italian basketball player suffered multiple health problems after receiving the Moderna vaccine. He was diagnosed with severe myopericarditis and spent a month in hospital. He posted his story on Instagram because he felt that “there is not enough talk about the side effects of the vaccine.”

Cienna Knowles, 19 year old Australian equestrian star experienced blood clots in the chest after receiving the second Pfizer jab. ”It’s amazing how quickly I transformed from a super healthy nineteen year old who trains and rides horses every day into a person with lungs full of blood clots.”

Francesca Marcon, 38 year old Italian volleyball player fell sick with pericarditis after receiving her second Pfizer dose. She posted her response on Instagram: “I am not anti vax but I was never convinced about getting the vaccine. Now I know why. I wonder – is there no form of compensation for those who suffer health damage after getting the vaccine?”

The question to be asked is how is it that super-fit athletes, at the height of their abilities, who undergo regular and extremely thorough health/heart tests every few years, can suddenly collapse with cardiac arrest so severe that they die or are often forced to give up their careers temporarily or permanently. Since this phenomenon often seems to have occurred soon after the athletes received their Covid vaccine jabs, many are left wondering: could these heart problems be a consequence of the vaccine?

Former Southampton pro Matt Le Tissier has called for an investigation into whether the vaccine could have contributed to this phenomenon. Speaking to GB news he said, “in all the time I played, I never once saw any footballer leave the pitch because of heart issues.”

The children will receive 2 Pfizer-BionTech shots, each one third the size of adult doses. The FDA approval of the vaccine was based on a Pfizer trial of 2,268 children which found that the vaccine offered 90% protection against infection and was safe and well tolerated. But criticism has been leveled at the trial on two counts:  the small size of the trial which one expert said was “not large enough to detect severe adverse events” and the fact that the participants were only monitored for one month following the second dose, meaning that no long-term follow-up has as yet been carried out.

On this flimsy basis, millions of children are about to be vaccinated for a disease which carries zero zero risk for children.

In an interview with Fox News, Dr. Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology at Yale University, stated categorically: “There is no justification at all for vaccinating young children.” He pointed to the fact that 66 deaths associated with Covid occurred in children aged 5-11 during the period October 2020 till October 2021 but only half of these were actual deaths from Covid and all 33 of these deaths were in children with chronic conditions (diabetes, cancer survival, obesity etc.). In contrast, he pointed out, in the same period 600 children died from motor vehicle accidents. “Healthy kids do not die from Covid,” he stressed, warning that “there will be far more deaths caused by the vaccines than the number of deaths caused in healthy kids by the virus.” Dr. Risch also said that he is ready to home-school his children if schools in the US mandate the vaccine for young children.

Across the world, deaths from Covid in young children have been in the zero bracket. A British study recently published in Nature magazine found that deaths from Covid were “extremely rare” among children. After analyzing data from all hospital admissions and deaths reported for children under 18 in the UK, the study found that Covid caused 25 deaths in this group during the period March 2020 and February 2021. Backing Dr. Risch’s claims, the study showed that half of these deaths were in children with underlying health conditions.

Vaccine Dangers

Other experts have been even more vociferous than Dr. Risch in their condemnation of the proposal to vaccinate young children. French geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude has called it “sheer insanity” and Nobel prizewinner Luc Montagnier warned that it was “irresponsible” to put children at risk and the side effects of the vaccine could affect future generations.

The impact on children has yet to be assessed but, since the vaccines have been administered to over 12 year olds both in the US and Europe for some time now, we know that they impact particularly negatively on teens and young people under 30. The reactions generated by the vaccines in young people are particularly strong because of their very strong immune system (older people react less powerfully because their immune systems are weaker). Several European countries have suspended the Moderna vaccine for under 30s because of myocarditis problems and Taiwan recently announced that it is halting the 2^nd dose of Pfizer for teens aged 12-17 because of similar concerns.

Dramatic stories of young people suddenly dying following a vaccine shot abound. A 17 year old girl died suddenly on Oct. 29 from cardiac arrest, she had received her second dose of Pfizer on Sept 15 and was hospitalized on Oct. 23 with abnormal EKG. “Cause of death possible acute myocarditis.” A 12 year old girl from South Carolina hemorrhaged 22 days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. A 13 year old girl from Maryland died from a heart condition after receiving her first Pfizer jab. A 17 year old girl was hospitalized with Guillain-Barré syndrome (when the body’s immune system attacks  its nerves) after receiving a vaccine (the above cases are all registered on VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System of the US, and cited on the site of Children’s Health Defense). It is known that one of the main side effects of the vaccine, in addition to thromboses and myocarditis, are neurological illnesses such as  Parkinson’s disease and Guillain-Barré (GBS). In Canada, 48 cases of GBS have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination.

French doctor, Dr. Andre Enluc, recounts a story he witnessed at first hand. “I was driving on a country road and saw a car stop in front of me. A young boy came out of the car followed by his mother. He had trouble walking and looked like he was undergoing some kind of nervous crisis. I stopped to help. The mother said the boy began to have headaches in the car, wanted to vomit, had problems articulating and was unable to swallow. He had no prior condition. I examined him and diagnosed a major cerebral event. The boy was 12 years old and had received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine. Since it is impossible to accumulate so many symptoms so quickly without any prior health condition, I concluded that the boy’s symptoms had been caused by the vaccine.”

An idea of the overall impact of the vaccine can be gaged from VAERS data even though VAERS is known to be highly under-reported. The latest data shows a total of 875,653 adverse events for all groups following Covid vaccines. This includes 18,461 deaths and 135,400 serious injuries in the period December 2020 to November 2021.

See the VAERS table below for a dramatic comparison of deaths after the flu vaccine and deaths after the Covid vaccine:

Public Distrust

In a first in Israel, the country’s Health Ministry recently held a five hour open discussion with the public on the vaccination of young children. The Ministry’s lack of transparency throughout the Covid pandemic is one of the reasons many Israeli parents, although vaccinated themselves, are hesitant about vaccinating their children and why officials expect an uphill battle in their vaccination campaign. In a recent survey, 45% of Israeli parents said there was not enough transparency around vaccine side effects and many complained about the suppression of information. All data and statistics on Covid published in the Israeli press are provided solely by the Ministry of Health. “The fact that the Health Ministry is the regulator, decision-maker and researcher is a problem,” says Dr. Tehilla Schwartz-Altshuler of the Israel Democracy Institute. “This is what has caused the lack of trust and, as a result, the public is unsure where to look for accurate information.” While most of the public health experts  who took part in the event spoke in favor of the vaccine – as a way of protecting children from Covid and as a tool for defeating the pandemic – Prof Rivka Carmi, of Ben Gurion University of the Negev, was one of the few who spoke against it. In her estimation, the risk of side effects from the vaccine is greater than the benefits: “Covid is a mild disease for children in most cases,” she said.

In Britain, Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope is a rare voice of enlightenment and compassion who wants to rectify this situation. Sir Christopher believes if a government promotes the mass vaccination of its population, it must also be transparent about the dangers involved, immediately process reports of adverse events and guarantee full compensation to vaccine victims. To this end Sir Christopher is pushing for new legislation in Britain (the Covid 19 Vaccine Damage Bill) that aims to take care of individuals who suffer injury or death as a result of being vaccinated. In his address to Parliament, Sir Christopher cited figures from the government’s yellow card portal which showed that in a 9 month period (9.12.2020-1.9.2021) there were 435 reports of major blood clots, 767 cases of inflammation of the heart, 35,000 reports of menstrual disorder and 1,632 reports of death shortly after vaccination.

“If we are trying to build vaccine confidence,” said Sir Christopher, “we need to ensure that we are open with the public about the facts.”

More worryingly, Sir Christopher also stated: “There is a lot more damage being done to our citizens as a result of Covid-19 vaccinations than in any other vaccination program in history.”

He went on to emphasize that he is in no way opposed to vaccination for Covid-19. “It is the right thing to do,” he says. “But people should be told ‘if you do the right thing, the government will look after you if something goes wrong.’”

While almost everywhere, fears about the Covid vaccines have been dismissed as “unfounded, the fabrication of anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists” Sir Christopher believes that these fears should be addressed and discussed openly. “We cannot suppress reports of coroners saying that somebody has died as a result of having a vaccination. I personally know of people who have suffered – people who were in really good health and then had their first vaccine. I know of one person in particular who then had a stroke and was in hospital for some time. There are not just anecdotes.

“The government may not be too keen to promote this information but failing to do this is actually counter-productive. We need to tell those who suffer adverse consequences that we will look after them 100% without expecting them to get lawyers and all the rest which is agonizing for families and loved ones. This is what we owe them.”

In April this year, Uttar Pradesh registered a peak of 38,000 Covid cases per day. Today it has barely 10 cases a day and the state government has declared half the province Covid free!

The story of how Uttar Pradesh achieved this miracle has been totally ignored in the Western media. That it has now emerged is thanks to French physician, Dr. Gerard Maudrux, who first posted the story on his blog (blog-gerard.maudrux.fr) where he offers his hypothesis for the blanket coverage: “In Uttar Pradesh, where healthcare is far inferior to ours, the result achieved has been spectacular, so brilliant that the world’s media decided to ignore it, for fear of ridiculing its respective governments.”  There are clearly other reasons for the blanket coverage, as readers will discover.

Here’s the story.

On May 5, Uttar Pradesh launched a massive “trace, test, track and treat” campaign to fight Covid. The campaign was conducted by over 2,000 government teams in 97,000 villages. What is extraordinary in this story is that the World Health Organization (WHO) actively participated in the campaign and supported it. A WHO article detailed the campaign: “Each team has two members who visit homes in villages and remote hamlets to test everyone with symptoms of Covid-19 using Rapid Antigen Tests kits. Those who test positive are quickly isolated and given a medicine kit with advice on disease management. All the contacts of those who test positive are quarantined and tested using an RT-PCR at home by a rapid response team.”

Five weeks after the start of the campaign, the number of new cases in the province plummeted by 97%.

The fascinating part of this story is the question: “What was in the kit that was distributed to the villagers of Uttar Pradesh?”

The answer is: “Ivermectin, Doxycyclin, zinc and Vitamin D.”

Why is this astounding? Well, just 5 weeks before, at the end of March, the WHO issued a directive on Ivermectin stating that: “current evidence on the use of Ivermectin to treat Covid-19 patients is inconclusive. Until more data is available, the WHO recommends that the drug only be used within clinical trials.”  This recommendation is part of the WHO’s guidelines on Covid-19 treatments.

At the end of August 2021, the state of Kerala (20% vaccinated) registered 31,445 new Covid cases per day while Uttar Pradesh (5% vaccinated) had 22 cases on the same day. Dr. Maudrux explains the difference in the results thus: “one had the kit, and the other refused it on the advice of the WHO.”  And not one case of poisoning was reported for this so-called “horse medication.”

Dr. Raoult’s early treatment therapy for Covid 19 has been categorically vindicated by an important study published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine, Evaluation of strategies to fight Covid 19 :The French Paradigm (Link).  The study compared Covid mortality rates from March to August 2020 in a number of countries (France, UK, Germany, Italy, Spain, S. Korea & China) with that of Dr. Raoult’s institute, the IHU of Marseilles.  In every age group, the IHU had the lowest mortality rate. The study also compared the IHU’s mortality rate with the rest of France and here too the IHU came out lowest.  While the Paris/Ile de France region had a whopping mortality rate of 9.9% the IHU had a mortality rate of 2.3%.

To remind readers, unlike the almost universal approach for Covid patients in the West,  which has  and still consists in waiting till Covid patients develop serious treatments before treating them, usually in hospital, when it is often too late, Dr. Raoult has consistently insisted on the importance of early treatment.  We now know that the first few days, in the fight against Colvid, are critical in preventing the development of serious symptoms. Early treatment therapies, such as Raoult’s  combo of hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin, can prevent 85% of hospitalizations and significant lower the mortality rate.

Raoult notes that studies often cited to prove the inefficacy or danger of hydroxychloroquine are  generally biased (as in the notorious Lancet study of May 2020 which claimed that hydroxychloroquine caused cardiac arrest and which was subsequently retracted because of bias and inaccuracy), or use inappropriate or ineffective dosages. “The UK’s Recovery study used a toxic hydroxychloroquine dosage three times higher than ours while France’s Discovery study used too low a dosage. No one bothered to ask me what the correct dosage should be,” exclaims a frustrated Raoult in a recent interview.

The good news – Covid infection rates are plummeting around the world

While political leaders attribute this outcome to the mass vaccination programs, Dr. Raoult is more circumspect. “To a certain degree the vaccines have played a part in lowering the infection rate but this outcome also reflects the natural evolution of the virus. We know that the more a virus mutates, the weaker it becomes. There is a definite correlation between the rate of infection and the number of mutations. Our data shows that the Delta virus has proven to be much less lethal than previous mutations.” Raoult points to the mortality rates for the different variants: “The most lethal was the Marseille 4 variant, which was a local mutation and had a lethality rate of 3.78%. The UK variant, subsequently called Alpha, had a lethality rate of 1.96%, while the Delta variant has a lethality rate of only 0.82%.”

 For or against vaccines?

To this question, Raoult is also circumspect: “It depends which vaccine one is talking about and for whom.  I certainly recommend vaccination for vulnerable populations such as the over 80s, the obese, cancer patients, people with serious pathologies and exposed health workers. In other cases the benefit/risk factor may not be valid. We know that the Astrazeneca vaccine is not recommended for women under 50 and now the UK has decided not to use it at all for people under 40.”

Bolstering his view is the realization that the vaccines come with a high risk factor. Lately Slovenia temporarily suspended the Johnson & Johnson vaccine after the death of a 20 year old woman  (the J&J vaccine was temporarily suspended in the US after being linked to numerous cases of blood clots) and Sweden, Denmark, Iceland and Finland have all halted the Moderna vaccine  because of myocarditis problems.

The current Covid vaccines, says Raoult, offer limited protection. “Recent studies show that the vaccines offer the greatest protection straight after vaccination but their efficacy wanes within a few months and is limited against the new variants.”

Vaccination of children?

While numerous Western countries have been vaccinating 12-16 year olds and may soon even allow vaccination for 5-11 year olds, Dr. Raoult is firmly opposed to the idea: “There is no evidence that Covid is dangerous for the young,” He says. “During the last 2 years, in France, less young people have died than in the previous three years.”

Stephanie Seneff is the author of Toxic Legacy, a new book which claims that the popular weedkiller glyphosate is behind the rise in autism. The book also cites astonishing correlations between glyphosate and the obesity and diabetes epidemics, Alzheimer’s disease and various cancers.  Seneff’s research on glyphosate propelled her to examine the potential dangers of mRNA Covid vaccines.  With fellow researcher, Greg Nigh, she published her findings in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research (See link to article) .

“What we found was terrifying,” she says. “We are facing a future that is even more grim than today in terms of auto-immune diseases, neurogenerative diseases and cancers. “ Seneff ‘s assertion that  mRNA vaccines are extremely dangerous is based on two phenomena.  The first is on the fact that the vaccines are designed to make our cells produce the virus’ spike protein and a strong antibody response. “The vaccines do this very well,” says Seneff. “But that is the danger because these antibodies can get out of control, become auto-antibodies and then attack all kinds of tissues, causing a host of auto-immune diseases and cancers.”

The other phenomenon is ADE (antibody dependent enhancement), whereby the antibodies that are produced in our cells facilitate the entry of the virus, instead of blocking it. “The antibodies can bind themselves to the virus and be protective but they do not necessarily enhance the immune system” she explains. “If you have a weakened immune system, these antibodies can cause the virus to multiply.” Seneff attributes the surge in Covid infections in highly vaccinated places to ADE. She cites the case of Provincetown in the US which recently saw a huge outbreak of infections, 75% of which were among the fully vaccinated: “As the vaccines decline in efficacy, the more the ADE phenomenon will kick in.”

During her research, Seneff  found that the spike protein produced by the vaccine accumulates in four organs: the spleen, ovaries, adrenal glands and liver, with the highest levels in the spleen.  The over-production of antibodies in the spleen, she says, results in a large percentage being shipped to the brain where they can cause diseases such as Parkinson’s Disease.  Seneff notes many reports of people developing Parkinson’s Disease a few weeks after receiving the vaccine. She cites other disturbing  adverse events of the vaccines such as miscarriages, resurgences of latent viruses such as shingles, herpes and Bells’ palsy and a higher number of Covid vaccine associated deaths than for all vaccines in the last four years (as reported in VAERS – the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System in the US).

“It’s the innate immunity which we need to strengthen in order to fight this virus,” says Seneff.

The right way of dealing with the pandemic, he said, is to focus on early ambulatory treatment, particularly for patients over 50 with medical issues. He estimated that, had doctors used such a treatment, 85% of all hospitalizations would have been spared.

In his call for early Covid treatment, Dr. McCullough echoes the approach of Dr. Didier Raoult in France and is joined by a small band of other fearless doctors in the US such as Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Harvey Risch. McCullough himself comes with robust credentials. He serves as Prof. of Medicine at the Texas A&M University and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas. And he is the most published scientist in his field of cardio-renal disease.Since the eruption of the epidemic, he has devoted himself to combatting Covid and championing early treatment.

“Unlike Ebola, Covid has a long phase of illness before it becomes serious. This is around two weeks which gives us a large window of opportunity to halt the disease. But there is nothing in the media on this or little research,” he noted in his testimony. Working with cheap available drugs McCullough  developed an early treatment protocol based on Vitamin D, C, zinc, quercetin and hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin. In conjunction with other scientists in the US and Europe, he published a paper on their findings entitled “Pathophysiological Basis and Clinical Rationale for Early Ambulatory Treatment for Covid 19” (Aug 6, 2020). “We felt that if we did not do something before hospitalization, we would never get the mortality rate down,” says McCullough. The paper went viral.  “At that time, there were 50,000 papers in peer-reviewed literature on Covid but not a single one told doctors how to treat patients. So our paper drew a lot of interest.”  So much so that McCullough was persuaded to put up a video on YouTube based on the paper. Within a week, the video was taken down by YouTube “for violating the terms of its community.”

“It was unbelievable that social media would strike down important scientific information.” (And it continues to do so, see box below).

At the same time the US health authorities began a clampdown on the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid patients. The FDA declared that “giving hydroxychloroquine to a Covid patient has no clinical effect and may be harmful to the patient.” This, despite numerous studies showing the effectiveness of the drug when administered early and in conjunction with other drugs such as azithromycin.

The question is – why was there a clampdown on drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and why a total information block and censoring of early Covid treatments?

McCullough explains how he understands what may go down as the medical scandal of the century.

“The turnaround began around April 2020. This is when it became known that the virus was amenable to a vaccine, and suddenly the entire medical focus shifted to vaccines. At the same time, therapeutics such as Remdesivir (which proved a total fiasco) were being pushed by big pharma. And, finally, the fact that the government announced that it would pay for all Covid hospitalizations, gave a great incentive to encourage, rather than prevent, hospitalizations.”

The big guns had done their work effectively. Never before had such an array of clout – big pharma/governmental institutions/medical organizations/academic journals/the press/and social media – joined forces to crush the little fellow, in this case, hydroxychloroquine and other early Covid treatments whose cost is negligible and therefore of little profit to the pharmaceutical companies.

The clampdown even included putting a gag order on doctors. “That was unprecedented,” says McCullough. He points out that the situation in Canada and Australia is even worse. “In Canada no early treatment (not even the antibiotic azithromycin) is permitted and, in Australia, a doctor who tries to treat Covid patients with hydroxychloroquine can be put in jail.”

Sadly the focus was placed entirely on vaccines (which made billions for big pharma and whose efficacy is now in doubt: the latest data shows that 60% of hospitalized Covid patients in the UK & Israel were fully vaccinated) or on expensive drugs like Remdesivir which do not work.

According to McCullough, the only organization in the US which offered information about early treatment was the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (branded in the press as a right-wing organization that pushes fringe views!). The AAPS even went so far as to sue the FDA to end its arbitrary restrictions on hydroxychloroquine. McCullough points out that “shockingly” the guidelines of the National Institute of Health state that “Covid patients should get no treatment before hospitalization but should be sent home and wait till they get sick.”

“I think these guidelines will do down in medical history as the most nihilistic, the most cruel and inhumane set of guidelines ever given.”

According to McCullough, all the patients who were hospitalized or died in the US received no home treatment.

Within a couple of days of McCullough’s testimony, the Texas Senate passed legislation mandating that information on early treatment be provided to every Covid patient.